All Obstacles During Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Exam Preparation with Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Real Test Questions
Fully Updated Free Actual Salesforce Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Exam Questions
NEW QUESTION # 35
Universal Containers uses the Case object to track service tickets. They have implemented Case teams to allow multiple support representatives to manage the Cases. Which two "Filter by owner" options would the user see while creating a list view on the Case object? Choose 2 answers
- A. Queue
- B. My Case Teams
- C. Roles
- D. Public Groups
Answer: A,B
NEW QUESTION # 36
A banking company uses & VIP Flag in the Contact Object that they want only Private Banking Reps to see.
Which approach is recommended to meet this requirement?
- A. Define a page layout for Contact Object and add the VIP Flag field for that layout. Remove the VIP Flag field from other layouts.
- B. Set the Field Level Security for the VIP Flag field so that it is visible to Private Banking Rep Profile.
- C. Change the type of VIP Flag field to a picklist, define a new record type for the Contact Object and make the picklist field available for Editing.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
Setting the Field Level Security for the VIP Flag field so that it is visible to Private Banking Rep Profile is the simplest and most effective way to meet this requirement, as Field Level Security controls whether a user can see, edit, and delete the values for a particular field on an object. Defining a page layout for Contact Object and adding the VIP Flag field will not work, as page layouts do not control field visibility, only field placement. Creating a criteria-based sharing rule for Contact Object and adding the VIP Flag field as a condition will not work, as sharing rules do not control field visibility, only record visibility.
NEW QUESTION # 37
Universal Containers (UC) tuned off the Customer User Visibility feature inits Customer Community.
What community functionality is expected by having the Customer User Visibility tuned off?
- A. Updating their user profile.
- B. Search for internal users.
- C. Creating new Customer community users.
- D. Searching for other external users.
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
By turning off the Customer User Visibility feature in its Customer Community, Universal Containers can expect that community functionality related to searching for other external users will be affected. The Customer User Visibility feature allows customer community users to find and collaborate with other customer community users who belong to different accounts. If this feature is turned off, customer community users can only see other users who belong to the same account as them. Turning off this feature will not affect creating new customer community users, updating their user profile, or searching for internal users.
NEW QUESTION # 38
A sales rep (John) at Universal Containers requested to update information in an account record where he has Read-Only access. John requested the Edit access permission from the owner of the record (Paul). Paul manually shared the record with John.
Assuming the organization-wide default of the Account object is Public Read-Only, what is the impact in the system?
- A. New AccountShare record is created. Row Cause is "Manual" and Access Level is "Read/Write".
- B. Existing AccountShare record is updated. Row Cause is "Manual" and Access Level is "Read/Write".
- C. New AccountShare record is created. Row Cause is "Owner" and Access Level is "Full".
Answer: A
Explanation:
When the account owner (Paul) manually shares a record with another user (John), Salesforce creates a new AccountShare record. The RowCause is set to "Manual" because the sharing is user-initiated, and the Access Level is set to the level granted (in this case, Read/Write).
* Option A: Existing AccountShare records are not updated; a new record is created.
* Option B (Correct): A new AccountShare record is created with "Manual" as the RowCause and "Read
/Write" as the Access Level.
* Option C: The RowCause "Owner" is used only for records shared due to ownership, not for manual sharing.
:
Sharing Object and RowCause
NEW QUESTION # 39
Universal Container (UC) is in a legal dispute regarding several orders. UC has found out these records VP of Sales has asked to ensure this cannot happen in the future.
What approach would meet this requirement?
- A. Implement a Sharing Rule that changes access for order to Read.
- B. Remove the Delete button from the Order Page Layout.
- C. Change the Record Type/Page Layout assignment for orders to be Read Only.
- D. Remove Order delete Permission from Profiles and Permission Sets
Answer: C,D
NEW QUESTION # 40
Universal Containers uses 75,000 distributors that have close to 1 million total users. Distributors need opportunities assigned to the distributor for delivery.
What license recommendation will meet distributor needs?
- A. Customer Community
- B. Sales Cloud
- C. Partner Community
- D. Customer Community Plus
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
The license recommendation that will meet distributor needs is Partner Community. Partner Community licenses are designed for users who are not employees of UC, but are part of their partner ecosystem, such as distributors, resellers, or suppliers. Partner Community users can access standard CRM objects such as accounts, contacts, leads, opportunities, cases, and campaigns. They can also collaborate with other partners and UC employees using Chatter and Communities. Sales Cloud licenses are for internal sales users who need full access to standard CRM and custom objects. Customer Community Plus licenses are for high-volume customers who need access to standard CRM objects and custom objects, but not opportunities. Customer Community licenses are for low-volume customers who need access only to custom objects and a subset of standard CRM objects.
NEW QUESTION # 41
Universal Containers (UC) service reps are assigned to a profile which has "View All" in Case object (Private OWD). To make sure service reps have access to all relevant information to attend to customer requests, which two details should a salesforce Architects consider?
Choose 2 answers:
- A. Service reps will not be able to access all UC contact records if they are controlled by parent.
- B. Service reps will be able to access all UC contact records if they are controlled by parent.
- C. Service reps will not be able to access all the UC Accounts records because Account OWD is private.
- D. Service reps will be able to access all the UC Account records due to Implicit Sharing.
Answer: A,C
Explanation:
Explanation
According to this source, if an object is set to Controlled by Parent in its organization-wide default settings, then access to its records is determined by the parent record. In this case, since Case object has View All permission for service reps, they will be able to access all contact records related to those cases, regardless of their ownership or sharing rules. However, they will not be able to access all account records, since account object has Private OWD and no other sharing mechanism is mentioned. The other options are not correct.
NEW QUESTION # 42
A user at Universal Containers would like to give access to a Report folder to someone else in the organization.
Which two access permissions should the user have to support this requirement?
Choose 2 answers.
- A. The "Viewer" Report folder permission
- B. The "Manage Reports in Public Folders" Profile permission.
- C. The "Editor" Report folder permission.
- D. The "Manager" Report folder permission.
Answer: B,D
NEW QUESTION # 43
Universal Containers regularly uploads large amounts of parent and child records into Salesforce to maintain integrations with other systems that update their date in scheduled batches or continuously in real time. Which two situations may pose a risk of producing locking errors? Choose 2 answers.
- A. Updates to child records that have the same parent records are being processed simultaneously in separate transactions.
- B. Updates to parent and child records are being processed synchronously in the same threads.
- C. Updates to parent and child records are being processed in the same batch.
- D. Updates to parent records and their child records being processed simultaneously in separate threads.
Answer: A,D
NEW QUESTION # 44
Universal Container has a set of Account management users that should only see accounts once the account becomes a customer. The type field on the Account identifies whether the account is a prospect, customer, partner, or other. Which two methods could an Architect use to enable this sharing requirement, assuming a private sharing model for accounts? Choose two:
- A. Create a public list view, where accounts of type customer are included and share the list view with account management public group
- B. Create an account sharing rule that shares all accounts owned by sales to be shared with account management roles and subordinates
- C. Institute a business process that calls for the account manager to be added to the account team once the account becomes a customer
- D. Create a criteria-based sharing rule that shares the account to the account management group when the type is customer
Answer: C,D
NEW QUESTION # 45
Sales operations at Universal Containers (UC) wants to create list views to filter opportunities for certain geographies.
How should UC hide list views that are not relevant to an individual user since there will be more than SO list views?
- A. Share the list views with the appropriate public group.
- B. Share the list views with the appropriate individual users.
- C. Share the list views with the appropriate queue.
Answer: A
Explanation:
* Managing List Views:
* Sharing list views with Public Groups allows administrators to control visibility efficiently while avoiding clutter for irrelevant users.
* Why Option C is Correct:
* Public Groups are the most scalable way to manage access to list views for users in specific geographies.
* Why Others Are Incorrect:
* Option A: Sharing with individual users is not scalable for managing access to 50+ list views.
* Option B: Sharing with a queue is not applicable as queues are used for record assignment, not list view sharing.
For detailed guidance, refer to Salesforce List View Sharing documentation: https://help.salesforce.com/
NEW QUESTION # 46
Users at Universal Containers are complaining that a field has disappeared from the Account page after last weekend's deployment. The page layout did not change with this deployment.
How should the admin troubleshoot this issue?
- A. View Field Accessibility in the Object Manager.
- B. Run a Who Sees What report, filtering on Account.
- C. Leg in as 3 user and check several accounts to isolate the problem records.
Answer: A
Explanation:
If a field disappears from the Account page, the likely cause is that its visibility has been restricted through Field-Level Security (FLS) or a related profile/permission set update. Using Field Accessibility in Object Manager allows the admin to review and troubleshoot field permissions across profiles.
* Option A: A "Who Sees What" report is used for record visibility, not field visibility.
* Option B: Logging in as a user might help confirm the issue but doesn't provide insights into why the field is missing.
* Option C (Correct): Field Accessibility offers a comprehensive view of field-level security for troubleshooting.
References:
* Field Accessibility
NEW QUESTION # 47
Universal Container has a set of Account management users that should only see accounts once the account becomes a customer. The type field on the Account identifies whether the account is a prospect, customer, partner, or other. Which two methods could an Architect use to enable this sharing requirement, assuming a private sharing model for accounts? Choose two:
- A. Create a public list view, where accounts of type customer are included and share the list view with account management public group
- B. Create an account sharing rule that shares all accounts owned by sales to be shared with account management roles and subordinates
- C. Institute a business process that calls for the account manager to be added to the account team once the account becomes a customer
- D. Create a criteria-based sharing rule that shares the account to the account management group when the type is customer
Answer: C,D
Explanation:
Explanation
Instituting a business process that calls for the account manager to be added to the account team once the account becomes a customer, and creating a criteria-based sharing rule that shares the account to the account management group when the type is customer are two methods that could be used to enable this sharing requirement, assuming a private sharing model for accounts. These methods would ensure that only accounts with type customer are shared with the account management users, and only when they are involved in the account team. Creating a public list view, where accounts of type customer are included and share the list view with account management public group is not a method to enable sharing, as it only filters the records that are already visible to the users, not grant access to new ones. Creating an account sharing rule that shares all accounts owned by sales to be shared with account management roles and subordinates is not a method to enable this sharing requirement, as it would share all accounts regardless of their type
NEW QUESTION # 48
The corporate identity and access team needs to audit User setup in the Salesforce org.
Which permission should be granted to this team so they can perform their audit?
- A. View All Users
- B. View All Data
- C. View permission on the User object
Answer: B
Explanation:
* View All Data Permission:
* The "View All Data" permission allows a user to see all data in the organization, including user records, regardless of sharing rules or OWD settings.
* Why Option C is Correct:
* The corporate identity and access team requires broad access to audit user setup. "View All Data" provides this level of visibility across the org.
* Why Others Are Incorrect:
* Option A: "View" permission on the User object is insufficient to audit all user setups.
* Option B: "View All Users" only allows visibility into user records, not their permissions or other related details.
For further information, see Salesforce permissions documentation: https://help.salesforce.com/
NEW QUESTION # 49
Universal Containers (UC) enables customers to manage issues using a customer Community license. The Case external organization-wide default is set to Private. Currently community users can only see cases they created.
What can be done to allow community users to see all cases for their account?
- A. Upgrade the licenses to Customer Community Plus.
- B. Write an Apex class to create manual shares for these users.
- C. Create a sharing set for these customers.
- D. Ensure the criteria-based sharing rule applies to all users.
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
A sharing set is the best way to share cases with customer community users based on a common account. Sharing sets are available for Customer Community licenses and can grant access to related records using predefined criteria1. Option A is incorrect, since writing an Apex class to create manual shares for these users would be complex and unnecessary. Option B is incorrect, since criteria-based sharing rules are not available for customer community users. Option D is incorrect, since upgrading the licenses to Customer Community Plus would be costly and not required in this scenario
NEW QUESTION # 50
Universal Containers has selected a small and diverse group of users to review inactive accounts. Given the Private sharing model, a public group was created and made available to this group of users. A sharing rule was created to make inactive accounts visible to the public group. However, some of these users are reporting they do not see any of the accounts that were shared with the public group.
What is the underlying issue for these users?
- A. The page layout assigned to these users is different than the Account owner.
- B. The accounts arc owned by users higher in the Role Hierarchy.
- C. The users are in profiles that have no access to the Account object.
Answer: C
Explanation:
In Salesforce, users must have object-level access (Read permission) to see records shared through sharing rules or any other mechanism. If some users in the public group lack the Read permission for the Account object, they will not be able to see the accounts, even though they are part of the public group with a sharing rule granting access.
* Option A (Correct): Lack of object-level permissions for the Account object explains why some users cannot view the shared accounts.
* Option B: Page layouts only affect how records are displayed, not record visibility.
* Option C: Role Hierarchy does not impact this issue, as it is related to public group sharing.
References:
* Object Permissions Overview
NEW QUESTION # 51
......
Validate your Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Exam Preparation with Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Practice Test: https://www.itexamsimulator.com/Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect-brain-dumps.html
Free Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Questions for Salesforce Sharing-and-Visibility-Architect Exam [Jun-2026]: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1L-j3u9panz6TpjK7qq04rEb2MzN84TDC
